Add a few more tests
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,13 +8,6 @@ const configRoot = '$root/AppData/RimWorld by Ludeon Studios/Config';
|
|||||||
const configPath = '$configRoot/ModsConfig.xml';
|
const configPath = '$configRoot/ModsConfig.xml';
|
||||||
const logsPath = '$root/ModManager';
|
const logsPath = '$root/ModManager';
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Few things we missed:
|
|
||||||
// 1. BuildLoadOrder should either return or throw a List<String> in addition to... List<String>
|
|
||||||
// That will represent errors
|
|
||||||
// Those would be incompatibilities, missing dependencies, unable to setup before/after and so on
|
|
||||||
// 2. Write tests for missing dependencies
|
|
||||||
// 3. Maybe write tests for missing loadBefore/loadAfter
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Mod makeDummy() {
|
Mod makeDummy() {
|
||||||
return Mod(
|
return Mod(
|
||||||
name: 'Dummy Mod',
|
name: 'Dummy Mod',
|
||||||
@@ -673,4 +666,231 @@ void main() {
|
|||||||
// modB might be excluded from load order due to its error
|
// modB might be excluded from load order due to its error
|
||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
});
|
});
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
group('Debug missing dependencies', () {
|
||||||
|
test(
|
||||||
|
'Should provide detailed information about missing dependencies but still load mods',
|
||||||
|
() {
|
||||||
|
final list = ModList();
|
||||||
|
list.mods = {
|
||||||
|
'modA': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod A',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modA',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['missingDep1', 'missingDep2'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
'modB': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod B',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modB',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['modA', 'missingDep3'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
list.enableAll();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
final result = list.generateLoadOrder();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Verify all missing dependencies are reported
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors, isNotEmpty);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingDep1')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingDep2')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingDep3')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Verify errors include the mod that requires the missing dependency
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('Mod A')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('Mod B')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// But mods should still be loaded anyway (the "It's fucked but anyway" philosophy)
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modA'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modB'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
group('Debug missing loadBefore/loadAfter relationships', () {
|
||||||
|
test('Should handle and report missing loadBefore targets', () {
|
||||||
|
final list = ModList();
|
||||||
|
list.mods = {
|
||||||
|
'modA': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod A',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modA',
|
||||||
|
loadBefore: ['missingMod1', 'missingMod2'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
list.enableAll();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
final result = list.generateLoadOrder();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Should still generate a valid load order despite missing soft constraints
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modA'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// System should track or report the missing loadBefore targets
|
||||||
|
// This may be implementation-specific - modify if needed based on how your system handles this
|
||||||
|
// May need to implement a warnings list in the BuildLoadOrderResult
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors, isEmpty); // Soft constraints shouldn't cause errors
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
test('Should handle and report missing loadAfter targets', () {
|
||||||
|
final list = ModList();
|
||||||
|
list.mods = {
|
||||||
|
'modA': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod A',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modA',
|
||||||
|
loadAfter: ['missingMod1', 'existingMod'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
'existingMod': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Existing Mod',
|
||||||
|
id: 'existingMod',
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
list.enableAll();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
final result = list.generateLoadOrder();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Should still generate a valid load order despite missing soft constraints
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modA'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('existingMod'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// The existing loadAfter relationship should be honored
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.loadOrder.indexOf('existingMod'),
|
||||||
|
lessThan(result.loadOrder.indexOf('modA')),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// System should track or report the missing loadAfter targets
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors, isEmpty); // Soft constraints shouldn't cause errors
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
group('Debug multiple constraint issues simultaneously', () {
|
||||||
|
test(
|
||||||
|
'Should detect and report both missing dependencies and loadBefore/loadAfter issues but still load mods',
|
||||||
|
() {
|
||||||
|
final list = ModList();
|
||||||
|
list.mods = {
|
||||||
|
'modA': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod A',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modA',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['missingDep'],
|
||||||
|
loadBefore: ['missingMod'],
|
||||||
|
loadAfter: ['anotherMissingMod'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
list.enableAll();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
final result = list.generateLoadOrder();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Should report the missing dependency
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors, isNotEmpty);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingDep')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Missing soft constraints shouldn't cause errors but should be handled gracefully
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingMod')), isFalse);
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('anotherMissingMod')),
|
||||||
|
isFalse,
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Mod should still be loaded despite missing dependencies
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modA'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
test(
|
||||||
|
'Should provide clear debugging information for complex dependency chains with issues while loading all possible mods',
|
||||||
|
() {
|
||||||
|
final list = ModList();
|
||||||
|
list.mods = {
|
||||||
|
'modA': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod A',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modA',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['modB', 'modC'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
'modB': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod B',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modB',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['missingDep1'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
'modC': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod C',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modC',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['missingDep2'],
|
||||||
|
loadAfter: ['nonExistentMod'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
list.enableAll();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
final result = list.generateLoadOrder();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Should report all missing dependencies
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors, isNotEmpty);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingDep1')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('missingDep2')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Should indicate which mods are affected by these missing dependencies
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('Mod B')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('Mod C')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// But all mods should still be loaded in the best possible order
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modA'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modB'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modC'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// And existing constraints should be respected
|
||||||
|
// modA depends on modB and modC, so it should load after them
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.loadOrder.indexOf('modB'),
|
||||||
|
lessThan(result.loadOrder.indexOf('modA')),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.loadOrder.indexOf('modC'),
|
||||||
|
lessThan(result.loadOrder.indexOf('modA')),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
test(
|
||||||
|
'Should try to satisfy as many dependencies as possible in "it\'s fucked but anyway" mode',
|
||||||
|
() {
|
||||||
|
final list = ModList();
|
||||||
|
list.mods = {
|
||||||
|
'harmony': makeDummy().copyWith(name: 'Harmony', id: 'harmony'),
|
||||||
|
'missingFramework': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Missing Framework',
|
||||||
|
id: 'missingFramework',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['nonExistentDep'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
'modA': makeDummy().copyWith(
|
||||||
|
name: 'Mod A',
|
||||||
|
id: 'modA',
|
||||||
|
dependencies: ['harmony', 'missingFramework', 'anotherMissingDep'],
|
||||||
|
),
|
||||||
|
};
|
||||||
|
list.enableAll();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
final result = list.generateLoadOrder();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Should report missing dependencies
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors, isNotEmpty);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('nonExistentDep')), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.errors.any((e) => e.contains('anotherMissingDep')),
|
||||||
|
isTrue,
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// All mods should still be included in load order despite missing dependencies
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('harmony'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('missingFramework'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
expect(result.loadOrder.contains('modA'), isTrue);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// Existing dependencies should still be respected in the ordering
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.loadOrder.indexOf('harmony'),
|
||||||
|
lessThan(result.loadOrder.indexOf('modA')),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
expect(
|
||||||
|
result.loadOrder.indexOf('missingFramework'),
|
||||||
|
lessThan(result.loadOrder.indexOf('modA')),
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
});
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user