dave/pyfa
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases 5 Wiki Activity

I think I changed something...

Browse Source 
This still works the same, but I think I changed a couple things that didn't look right.
This commit is contained in:
Mr. Nukealizer
2016-07-30 04:20:00 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent fea1a28760
commit 394381c736
1 changed files with 17 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
eos/effects/adaptivearmorhardener.py
View File

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ def handler(fit, module, context):
for num in range(50):
#logger.debug("Starting cycle %d.", num)
# The strange order is to emulate the ingame sorting when different types have taken the same amount of damage.
# This doesn't take into account stacking penalties. In a few cases fitting a Damage Control causes an inaccurate result.
damagePattern_tuples = [
(0, baseDamageTaken[0] * RAHResistance[0], RAHResistance[0]),
(3, baseDamageTaken[3] * RAHResistance[3], RAHResistance[3]),
@@ -53,12 +54,20 @@ def handler(fit, module, context):
if sortedDamagePattern_tuples[2][1] == 0:
# One damage type: the top damage type takes from the other three
change0 = min(resistanceShiftAmount, 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[0][2])
change1 = min(resistanceShiftAmount, 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[1][2])
change2 = min(resistanceShiftAmount, 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[2][2])
# Since the resistances not taking damage will end up going to the type taking damage we just do the whole thing at once.
change0 = 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[0][2]
change1 = 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[1][2]
change2 = 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[2][2]
change3 = -(change0 + change1 + change2)
elif sortedDamagePattern_tuples[1][1] == 0:
# Two damage types: the top two damage types take from the other two
# Since the resistances not taking damage will end up going equally to the types taking damage we just do the whole thing at once.
change0 = 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[0][2]
change1 = 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[1][2]
change2 = -(change0 + change1) / 2
change3 = -(change0 + change1) / 2
else:
# Two or more damage types: the top two damage types take from the other two
# Three or four damage types: the top two damage types take from the other two
change0 = min(resistanceShiftAmount, 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[0][2])
change1 = min(resistanceShiftAmount, 1 - sortedDamagePattern_tuples[1][2])
change2 = -(change0 + change1) / 2
@@ -75,7 +84,7 @@ def handler(fit, module, context):
tolerance = 1e-09
if abs(RAHResistance[0] - val[0]) <= tolerance and abs(RAHResistance[1] - val[1]) <= tolerance and abs(RAHResistance[2] - val[2]) <= tolerance and abs(RAHResistance[3] - val[3]) <= tolerance:
loopStart = i
#logger.debug("Loop found: %d-%d", loopStart + 1, num)
#logger.debug("Loop found: %d-%d", loopStart, num)
break
if loopStart >= 0: break
if loopStart >= 0: break
@@ -83,7 +92,7 @@ def handler(fit, module, context):
cycleList.append(list(RAHResistance))
if loopStart < 0:
logger.error("Reactive Armor Hardener failed to find equalibrium. Damage profile after armor: %f/%f/%f/%f", baseDamageTaken[0], baseDamageTaken[1], baseDamageTaken[2], baseDamageTaken[3])
logger.error("Reactive Armor Hardener failed to find equilibrium. Damage profile after armor: %f/%f/%f/%f", baseDamageTaken[0], baseDamageTaken[1], baseDamageTaken[2], baseDamageTaken[3])
# Average the RAH profiles that it loops through
loopCycles = cycleList[loopStart:]
@@ -95,8 +104,7 @@ def handler(fit, module, context):
# Set the new resistances
#logger.debug("Setting new resist profile: %f/%f/%f/%f", average[0], average[1], average[2],average[3])
for i, damagePatternType in enumerate(('Em', 'Thermal', 'Kinetic', 'Explosive')):
attr = "armor%sDamageResonance" % damagePatternType
for i, attr in enumerate(('armorEmDamageResonance', 'armorThermalDamageResonance', 'armorKineticDamageResonance', 'armorExplosiveDamageResonance')):
module.forceItemAttr(attr, average[i])
fit.ship.multiplyItemAttr(attr, module.getModifiedItemAttr(attr), stackingPenalties=True, penaltyGroup="preMul")
fit.ship.multiplyItemAttr(attr, average[i], stackingPenalties=True, penaltyGroup="preMul")